"has got away with tax evasion....ooops...i mean has been acquitted and found innocent  "
It's ok the rest of us can pay a little extra, I don't mind supporting multi millionaires in these times of austerity it must be hard for them  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Considering the Inland Revenue have not been bothered to chase the likes of Goldman Sachs and Vodafone for vastly more tax than Redknapp's case, I am quite pleased the jury stuck it to them.
A classic case of someone in either the CPS or HMRC wanting to make a name for themself with a high-profile scalp. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Considering the Inland Revenue have not been bothered to chase the likes of Goldman Sachs and Vodafone for vastly more tax than Redknapp's case, I am quite pleased the jury stuck it to them.
A classic case of someone in either the CPS or HMRC wanting to make a name for themself with a high-profile scalp."
Agree and it was a waste of £8 million.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ids-cplCouple
over a year ago
Sheffield |
5 years, 8 million quid and the main prosecution argument was an interview with the news of the world, all for an alleged 30grand in unpaid tax, from 2 guys that have paid over 100 million in vat over the years. Guilty? my arse
coys. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
